Caution!

Visiting this web site requires a newer version of Netscape Communicator.

Visit Microsoft's Web site to obtain the newest version of Internet Explorer, or visit Netscape's Web site to obtain the newest version of Netscape Communicator.

Visiting this web site without first upgrading your browser may result in unreliable behavior.











PdK CONSULTING



Home


About PdK


Contact Us

SERVICES



Services Overview











REFERENCES



Case Study


Alliances


Client List


Bibliography


Links


Articles

SKEPTIC'S FAQ's



FAQ's

MORE INFORMATION



Glossary


Request Info




 






"Economic Value Added - (EVA)" (1)

ECONOMIC VALUE-ADDED: BEYOND PAPER PROFITS

This commonsensical idea is formalized in the relatively new mainstream of corporate finance called economic value-added (EVA). Quite simply, EVA is the after-tax cash flow a firm derives from its invested capital less the cost of that capital. EVA represents what Warren Buffet calls "owners' earnings," as opposed to paper profits. A key finding of the theorists who developed EVA is that reported profits and earnings per share do not correlate to shareholder value (in terms of the total market value of the firm), but EVA does-strongly. Peter Drucker, so often among the first to articulate important new business ideas, asserts bluntly that when a firm consistently falls to generate after-tax cash flow larger than the cost of the capital provided by its shareholders, it destroys both its capital and shareholder value.

An article in Fortune makes explicit the connection between intangibles such as processes and EVA:

"How much capital is tied up in your operations? Even if you don't know the answer, you know what it consists of: what you paid for real estate, machines, vehicles and the like, plus working capital. But proponents of EVA say there's more. What about the money your company spends on R&D? On employee training? Those are investments meant to pay off for years, but accounting rules say you can't treat them that way; you have to call them expenses, like the amounts you spend on electricity. EVA proponents say forget the accounting rules. For internal purposes, call these things what they are: capital investments. No one can say what their useful life is, so make your best guess-say five years. It's truer than calling them expenses."

Because business processes are a substantial, though largely hidden part of a firm's total capital, EVA is an essential tool for business process investment; it is the only way to determine whether a particular process is an asset or a liability. Some of the companies I discuss later-notably, PepsiCo, Inc., CSX, and AT&T Corp.-report major improvements in resource allocation to processes as a direct result of adopting EVA.

(1) The Process Edge - Creating Value Where It Counts
      - Peter G.W. Keen - page 20-21

 

Return to Index










E-mail us or call 415-453-6902
Web Site design by Got2BConnected.com





Sign In
Sign In